I watched Hot Rod last weekend for the first time in a while and although it is a fairly stupid movie, I still found it to be hilarious and I would like to see what critics thought about the movie. According to Rotten Tomatoes, critics seemed to mainly dislike the movie while audiences tended to favor it. Alonso Duralde from NBC News (http://www.nbcnews.com/id/20042628/site/todayshow/ns/today-entertainment/t/hot-rod-revs-silly-summer-fun/#.UQs6t6Vho-0z) wrote a fairly long review about Hot Rod, explaining what the movie is really like. He makes it clear that the movie is mainly focused on making you laugh and states, "If you came to “Hot Rod” to see some impressive auto stunt work, you’re in the wrong theater, and should consider sneaking into the breathtaking “Bourne Ultimatum” instead."I completely agree with this quote because unlike a lot of new movies that focus on great acting, amazing camera work, and modern special effects, this movie focused on crazy and ridiculous stunts and scenes that were meant to make you laugh, not impress you. If you want to see great acting and breathtaking special effects, then this is not the right movie. He starts off the review talking about what the main character, Rod, is like and goes on to explain what the movie is about and how he felt about it. I think he gave a good and honest review, telling it how it is. He basically said throughout the review that the audience should not expect too much, but if you are looking for a good laugh and a lot of funny stunts then this movie is for you. The tone of the review is pretty positive and it has very descriptive vocabulary such as, "infectious goofiness," and "youthful enthusiasm," to describe the style of the movie. The writers main focus I think was to inform the reader about the style and that if you are a fan of SNL stars Andy Samberg and Bill Hader, and you also like movies with Will Ferrell comedy, then you will like this movie. There were several references to the comedy genre and also to the SNL stars that are in this movie, because they are very well known and this movie has SNL style comedy.
The second review that I found was not as positive as the first. Kyle Smith from the New York Post titled his review, "Rod Awful."(http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/item_cGNTy61weUZiQiFR2PnmlI)
This review is very critical of the movie and the writer claims he hardly laughed at all. The review starts off very critical and then goes on to explain the plot of the movie and then at the end it states that if you have to watch the movie, you should bring along a cell phone or some other sort of entertainment to keep you entertained during the movie. The tone is very annoyed and negative and the writer seems like he wants to get the minutes he wasted watching the movie back. The writer used vocabulary and phrases such as, "the script lies motionless in a puddle of unfunny" and "Such "Jackass" moves work if you know someone is actually dumb enough to do all this stuff, but "Hot Rod" is so inept at building raw elements of comedy into actual humor that it's as if a stroke victim presented you with containers of flour, sugar, butter, eggs and cocoa and called it brownies," to display his anger and frustration with the movie. His main focus of writing this review I believe is to stop anyone who is considering watching this movie from watching it. He showed so much disdain in his review that it would stop anyone from watching this movie. He made reference to Will Ferrell and early Adam Sandler type comedy to explain what this movie is like and how stupid he believed it was. There were no quotes from this review that I could agree with because the whole thing was so negative, and I personally enjoyed the movie.
I think that the first review would be more helpful and convincing had I not seen this movie before because the writer does not say the movie is great or terrible, he gives an honest review. The second review was completely negative and the writer did not have one good thing to say, which is a little extreme and unhelpful. I think both positive and negative comments are necessary to make a great review because no movie is a perfect, yet no movie that is in theaters or on DVD is unwatchable.
If I were to write a review about this movie, I would write about what I did and did not like about the movie. I would recommend the movie to teens and young adults because I think this style of comedy applies to those age groups. I would also explain the type of comedy in the movie: stupid, crash and get hurt comedy that is meant to make you laugh. The characters are also all very strange and they all seem to be out of school living at home with their parents, with no real direction in life. The movie however has a somewhat inspiring storyline due to the fact that Rod is doing these stunts to save his step-father, however, he is mainly doing this just so that he can beat him up. Overall, this is a very funny movie and if you want to watch a movie that will make you and your friends laugh on a Friday night, then this is a great movie to check out.
Good job, Eric. Nice job outlining the reviews. Try to figure out the background issue with the post. I think sometimes if you copy and paste the formatting shifts; if you can, you might want to try to fix that issue. But good work with the reviews. Use more specifics when you can, and watch out for grammar mistakes.
ReplyDelete